From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3cc61b675eac7c7a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.189.72 with SMTP id gg8mr8198995pbc.4.1327842650630;
        Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni237441pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada as glue ? logical approach ?
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jg3ggq$pht$1@dont-email.me>
References: 
 <9e698480-636a-419f-9b50-400b322de8d4@dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="DkTdSjxOCm6DqG+Uf7eArg";
	logging-data="26173"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+YyU+WYuTIh2dUWK73L9+nRUhvZDtlT/8="
User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; GIT cb32159 master)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TflEdJvwch/7g1bddCO3KB5v2rY=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-01-29T13:10:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:53:21 -0800, Patrick wrote:

> Hi Everyone
> 
> I have been studying ada for sometime now but I have no experience
> coding with it.
> 
>  It doesn't look like there are all the library bindings i want but I
> am wondering if this really matters.
> 
> Someone could write a full binding for a library but could someone also
> not just use the import pragma to "grab onto" the existing C library
> APIs?
> 
> This would be a bit like ctypes in Python correct ? Are other list
> members writing their own 'as needed' partial bindings? Is this a
> logical approach? -Patrick

In addition to agreeing with the other comments - especially the 
recommendation to make a "thick binding" to give you an Ada-like 
interface, rather than exposing the C-like details any more widely than 
necessary...

if you use a recent enough version of GCC, you can compile a C or C++ 
header file with the -fdump-ada-spec or -fdump-ada-spec-slim options, and 
it will automatically generate the thin binding (with import pragmas) for 
you. The -slim version just compiles the header you give it; the fat 
version compiles the transitive closure (i.e. all the header files it 
imports too, recursively)

The result is not perfect; very good on plain C but it doesn't handle C++ 
templates very well (last time I looked) but even then, it saves a lot of 
time.

I would implement the Ada binding as a package that uses this, exposing 
only Ada types and functions to the rest of your code.

A very simple example : 
http://wiki.ada-dk.org/c_bindings_example

If you are importing C rather than C++, ignore the bit about saving the 
header as .hpp. (There is another way to force C vs C++, not covered in 
the article. Compile a .h file with g++ rather than gcc)

See also 
http://www.adacore.com/2009/02/23/gem-59/

- Brian