From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 03:35:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pec-101-180.tnt7.hh2.uunet.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Compilers Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3CE2C8FD.CDD0E75B@nbi.dk> <3ce2e29f.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-101-180.tnt7.hh2.uunet.de (149.225.101.180) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1021545348 22637491 149.225.101.180 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24172 Date: 2002-05-16T12:37:21+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 16 May 2002 00:35:35 +0200, "Kai Schuelke" wrote: >could you please explain whats the difference to the Aonix compiler? Or >which annexes the other compilers didn't implement? I believe it just limits the number of compilation units to 30. >I am just a beginner but >my first impression was that Aonix produced more "reliable" results. But >thats just a feeling. It does some things better and some worse than GNAT. It is nice to have both, because in case of a compilation error messages from GNAT and from Aonix nicely complement each other. (:-)) --- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de