From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec3b1a84cab8fc8a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-06 12:39:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and the NMD
Date: 6 Sep 2001 14:39:13 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <jfDbtwHhlbrh@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <3B970152.4AC6C6E3@PublicPropertySoftware.com>
 <slrn9petoj.bl.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <zhLl7.6472$4z.24987@www.newsranger.com>
 <slrn9pfbm4.ln.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3B9795E1.54B12E70@worldnet.att.net> <sQOl7.6806$4z.28740@www.newsranger.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 999805156 6888 192.135.80.34 (6 Sep 2001
 19:39:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12835
Date: 2001-09-06T14:39:13-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <sQOl7.6806$4z.28740@www.newsranger.com>, Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> In article <3B9795E1.54B12E70@worldnet.att.net>, James Rogers says...
>>
>>Preben Randhol wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyhow the current goverment of USA does not seem to care at all about
>>> the environment.
>>> 
>>The current US government cares deeply about the environment. It
>>simply does not agree with certain international political "solutions".
> 
> OK. Preben's statement seemed a bit extreme, but this one is a real howler.
> 
> As ususal I think the truth is somewhere in the middle, although I have to say
> that I've yet to see any *hard* evidence that Preben is wrong. However, you
> can't really use the term "government" wrt the US as Preben does, because we
> don't quite work that way. Our government has 2 political branches, one of which
> is split into two parts. Of those 3, 2 are presently controlled by one party,
> and the third is (barely) controlled by another. Obviously, you'll search in
> vain for any kind of unified coherent message comming out of the whole.

Please do not assume from Ted's remarks that when all three were
controlled by a single party there was a coherent message.