From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,925ee3b10e43c3f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jcreem@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com (Jeff Creem)
Subject: Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
Date: 1997/05/22
Message-ID: <jcreem-2205971233150001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 243295302
References: <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>
Organization: Jeff Creem
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>, Rick Flower
<flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:

>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth?  Sounds pretty pathetic
>to me!  At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!

Well they have Ada 95 support. There are a few things they could
add to improve the backwards compatibility (such as adding back in
some of the now optional float attributes).

How much is it really going to hurt you to have to use an Ada 95 compiler
instead?

Jeff