From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7767a311e01e1cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:17:37 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:10:03 -0400 From: Jeffrey Creem User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT compiler switches and optimization References: <1161341264.471057.252750@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <9Qb_g.111857$aJ.65708@attbi_s21> <434o04-7g7.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> <4539ce34$1_2@news.bluewin.ch> <453A532F.2070709@obry.net> <9kfq04-sgm.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> <5vgs04-64f.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> <453bc74e$0$19614$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <4jit04-0gq.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> In-Reply-To: <4jit04-0gq.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Trace: sv3-EbNvg11zZ9N++Ue/ahZPHMbV2ETtrDzY8dvfhL9aOp0jtcxPmCSYmyrXHZJanUAJbrHjPmJ97TtQ+cw!bp7w/LArAfQQAwhXYSynIp5FxIvw1rDx/6i4h8XxhM/byCwVPe4CDq93iX2Xz0a6+ID8RfQG5uCU!HRA= X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7152 Date: 2006-10-22T23:10:03-04:00 List-Id: Ok, a lot of suggestions have been posted including a few that I have not addressed or even investigated (specifically, the post that talked about the assembly language output from gcc 4.0.3 which makes this appear (to me) to be a regression. Having said that, I did update the wiki site with some timing numbers people asked for from a dual processor machine. http://gnuada.sourceforge.net/pmwiki.php/Main/Oct2006CLAGFORTRANComparison Scroll to the bottom and start reading at "Other Versions" if you are interested. This is getting too messy for plain text conversation.