From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ae8393ad9100e97 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.191.41 with SMTP id gv9mr9939752pbc.5.1324072870603; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:01:10 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni30547pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada2012 : When to use expression functions rather than function bodies? Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:01:08 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.213.71.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1324072869 1053 97.213.71.124 (16 Dec 2011 22:01:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:01:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2011-12-16T15:01:08-07:00 List-Id: On 12/16/2011 05:25 AM, Martin wrote: > Are there any good arguments for *not* replacing all simple, single > line functions that don't [directly] access package body state > information with expression functions? Are there any good arguments for expression functions? -- Jeff Carter "I like it when the support group complains that they have insufficient data on mean time to repair bugs in Ada software." Robert I. Eachus 91 --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---