From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b78c363353551702
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr16062911pbc.7.1341660717817;
        Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni11086pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: about the new Ada 2012 pre/post conditions
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:31:46 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <jbeokseeb72m$.lp6dijjc0foj$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <jrsjr7$uuo$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1hgo6aks03zy.by4pq4xbjsgf$.dlg@40tude.net> <jrsmfh$6fq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <npdjip6ohqlt$.1x6bxc9jsaago$.dlg@40tude.net> <js00co$clj$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1jvy3elqtnd1j.1sjbk32evhp1f$.dlg@40tude.net> <js2hq5$9fj$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1oih2rok18dmt.avbwrres5k12.dlg@40tude.net> <jsttoc$hc2$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <13hfxjlq0xqtq.x3v8evyf4pku$.dlg@40tude.net> <jt2thn$1hr$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <13p2n1ve6lbrc.yr8d2a5ljm8$.dlg@40tude.net> <jt80n3$gjh$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1ee9qp0cy5me4.1vh22pi92ls6n$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4ff81ae0$0$9504$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-07-07T13:31:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:17:52 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 07.07.12 10:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>> Contract is roughly equivalent to (Ada) specification. Implementation is
>>> roughly equivalent to (Ada) body.
> 
>> There are two kind entities involved A and
>> B. The check may be attributed to either A or B.
> 
> There is no need for such attribution.

Still, it is either A or B.

> The point is that the "program proper", i.e. the list of instructions,
> is the very same irrespective of monitoring assertions.

The program is not a list of instructions. The latter is called "code" of
the program. But the error is *very* telling.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de