From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab5f27c42c253ac5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fi.sn.net!newsfeed2.fi.sn.net!feeder2.news.jippii.net!reader1.news.jippii.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Tapio Kelloniemi Subject: GNAT and GNU build system Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:36:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.30.176.187 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: reader1.news.jippii.net 1091561807 217.30.176.187 (Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:36:47 EEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:36:47 EEST Organization: Saunalahti Customer Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2518 Date: 2004-08-03T19:36:47+00:00 List-Id: Hi I'm planning to seriously develop free software packages in Ada. The problem I have is GNTA's fitness for GNU program building standards. I would like to autoconfize my project (not very bad, some M4 macros can be found in GtkAda). But I would like to use automake (my projects are in Ada and C, because almost every free software library is written in C). I also want than configure creates config.h and a gnatprep definition file with almost the same values. And what about GNU gettext support. I'm not an autotools expert and this might be a wrong place to discuss this subject, but I choose CLA, because folks here know GNAT, which autotools mailing list readers probably don't know. If anyone has had any experience or interest regarding this, please drop a line. -- Tapio