From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,565d6a6c6ff7cb37 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-01 17:48:15 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!feeder.via.net!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GPL and Plug-INs and XML\Ada References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 00:48:15 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.20.190.201 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com 988764495 24.20.190.201 (Tue, 01 May 2001 17:48:15 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 17:48:15 PDT Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:7073 Date: 2001-05-02T00:48:15+00:00 List-Id: >be possible then to include GPL'd plug-ins with out the application >becoming GPL'd? Seems to me the app is effectively an OS running a program (the plug-in) which happens to be GPL'd. Clearly creating a plug-in with one license cannot change the terms of the original app's license, and I presume the GPL is not intended to prevent the creation/distribution of GPL'd plug-ins.