From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,77becc9f13dd1c5f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-15 17:26:06 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news-east.rr.com!news.rr.com!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws06.ne.mediaone.net!24.91.0.34!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeff Creem" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3AD79903.C48AB1BB@mail.utexas.edu> Subject: Re: Q re Unchecked_Deallocation for unconstrained arrarys. X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:10:55 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.67.93 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net X-Trace: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net 987379855 24.147.67.93 (Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:10:55 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:10:55 EDT Organization: Road Runner Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6906 Date: 2001-04-16T00:10:55+00:00 List-Id: "Bobby D. Bryant" wrote in message news:3AD79903.C48AB1BB@mail.utexas.edu... > Does Unchecked_Deallocation work with unconstrained arrays? If so, will yes > a single instance work for all arrays in the type, or is a different > instance needed for each actual array size? Just one.