From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:56:43 -0700 From: glen herrmannsfeldt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <5rSdnTfTP7NHEyzZnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@comcast.com> <4vXsg.3182$tE5.2948@news-server.bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.18.174.4 X-Trace: sv3-4d5OhMeuX9Fu6yhAoy1RbWjOIuiLXR6NabB43qY/hIbqJ5ZjujeyRd7+xmdVA6MQnXt5t8zhd5naFUn!QvAAmmFgwMXeUfIRQvS71nLIz3mBoq8adGMXd5ydWw3a/uQtxKeDIIzJ+Gtug7IQRZxZFuE97Zig!U9Mk2Q== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5674 comp.lang.fortran:12032 comp.lang.pl1:2007 Date: 2006-07-13T19:56:43-07:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: (snip on ones complement machines) > We did an Ada 95 compiler for the U2200 series in the late 1990's and it > surely was still available then, and it certainly was one's complement. That > caused a lot of problems with the compiler front-end (it assumed two's > complement in a number of places), and we uncovered a number of issues with > the Ada Standard as well. Thanks. I tried to find it on the univac web site once, but they don't give details for most of the machines. -- glen