From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-17 19:12:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Outside view (still): Development process in the Ada community Date: 17 Apr 2002 21:12:05 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <5ee5b646.0204171415.18ac5e85@posting.google.com> <99c4aee4a9ea33ca8fbe1e634b3b4f14.48257@mygate.mailgate.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1019095927 27328 192.135.80.34 (18 Apr 2002 02:12:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 02:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22694 Date: 2002-04-17T21:12:05-05:00 List-Id: In article <99c4aee4a9ea33ca8fbe1e634b3b4f14.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>, "Kent Paul Dolan" writes: > "Robert Dewar" wrote: > >> What makes languages brittle is when they accumulate ill thought out >> junk that does not work well and cannot be easily modified. > > And what makes languages rigid is that they fail to incorporate good > ideas that do work out well and have been widely praised. ACT has experimented with several pragmas and attributes outside the standard. What other ideas have been worked out and proven in an Ada environment ?