From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bcc293dc5642650
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.156.155 with SMTP id x27mr3938938bkw.7.1319570787228;
        Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 l23ni41168bkv.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!news.tornevall.net!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!jacob-sparre.dk!ada-dk.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why no Ada.Wide_Directories?
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:26:23 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <j872h1$3o4$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <9937871.172.1318575525468.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prib32>
 <418b8140-fafb-442f-b91c-e22cc47f8adb@y22g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <j7i6va$nso$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.v3i09evqule2fv@index.ici>
 <j7jj9s$k5$1@dont-email.me>
 <20586225.484.1319265164765.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prgt10>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1319570786 3844 69.95.181.76 (25 Oct 2011 19:26:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:26:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18702
Date: 2011-10-25T14:26:23-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Michael Rohan" <michael@zanyblue.com> wrote in message 
news:20586225.484.1319265164765.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prgt10...
...
>This extension of the existing packages would be something that might be 
>possible to
>consider for the next revision (but maybe too late?).

Ada 2012 is essentially finished (it will be really finished as soon as I 
finish fixing the latest batch of editorial comments). So it is way too late 
for anything but the most trivial changes.

At this point, all suggestions are going into Ada 2020 (the provisional name 
for the following revision - where we'll have perfect vision of what Ada 
should be ;-).

                                 Randy.