From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ea33c39efc56ac3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.46.193 with SMTP id x1mr2423371pbm.7.1318450023337; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:07:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: d5ni2781pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feedme.ziplink.net!news.swapon.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!jacob-sparre.dk!ada-dk.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: sharp � and ss in Ada keywords like ACCESS Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:06:59 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <4e931db5$0$6541$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1f9a5099-f5f5-49a8-8773-b7eaca771427@s5g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <4e93381d$0$6545$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4e959011$0$6627$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4r1gqrovnlyw$.u64367deu6pt$.dlg@40tude.net> <4e95db62$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1318450022 21555 69.95.181.76 (12 Oct 2011 20:07:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:07:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18424 Date: 2011-10-12T15:06:59-05:00 List-Id: "Georg Bauhaus" wrote in message news:4e95db62$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net... ... > I'd try a KISS definition of "alphabet". It does not involve > national languages, or meaning. If it is not a 10646 character classification, it isn't practical to use in Ada (or any other programming language). Attempting to invent our own classifications would be a recurring nightmare as new characters are added to the character sets. The Unicode people have spent a lot of effort thinking about the issues of extended characters in identifiers, and it makes the most sense to build on their work rather than inventing some of our own. After all, they're the character experts, not us. Randy.