From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e56fd2619c02e35a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr28056790pbk.6.1317122487320; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: lh7ni5926pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mok-Kong Shen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 64 bit codes Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:21:27 +0200 Organization: albasani.net Message-ID: References: <4e817fdb$0$7615$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <213da3b7-f9d0-4a7d-b215-9992ee0f1a02@f6g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <2a797a9e-f0e3-4fbe-8f40-b6787b4e2879@o11g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: news.albasani.net LQykKgsg+L7BQOtv3oxcE30hYJ2bCb5zzgeNEZK/Dvcr+b96E2JH9tiWcwXuXx1F62KyhZXxfA1l31dVnauKQJ0ozQRnz/C46uTESg32aLa5xOG+qL3tC0cOfGZsGesd NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="fdDR7BBHpLFS0YPnMNPe2MO0qgI+AXnDjJM670JfQIICDJRqbl9QxGJj8eV6fCbzqqpDq3Btdr2UYMytyNBRY/WqhjeHqla1mGXkxRD9yyCdkLASauzKIdI80VGXXFuU"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 In-Reply-To: <2a797a9e-f0e3-4fbe-8f40-b6787b4e2879@o11g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:bvnB8AWR/HStK78Asvi8hHuCGU0= Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18161 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2011-09-27T13:21:27+02:00 List-Id: Am 27.09.2011 12:08, schrieb Ludovic Brenta: > You could always ask but, if history is any indication of the future, > I don't anticipate any changes before GNAT GPL 2012. > > Out of curiosity, why do you need 64-bit support? Does your program > require more than 2 GB of memory? If so and if this is urgent, you > can use the 64-bit version of GNAT on another 64-bit operating system > such as Debian on your hardware... I have some computations that would be much more efficient, if done with 64-bit arithmetics ("natively") than with 32-bit arithmetics and I don't like to take the trouble/"risk" of having a 2nd OS on my PC (I don't think currently to possess even the proper knowledge to do that at all). On the other hand, as outsider I surmise that providing a 64-bit Windows version doesn't involve much work, since there is already a 32-bit version. It's essentially just a replacement of the included gcc from the 32-bit version to the 64-bit version, isn't it? M. K. Shen