From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-05 07:28:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!news-in-sanjose!newsfeed.onecall.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: 5 Oct 2001 09:28:49 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <9pgr68$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3bbd6287.346843109@news.cis.dfn.de> <3BBDBB4B.523FDC82@worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1002292131 4209 192.135.80.34 (5 Oct 2001 14:28:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 14:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13788 Date: 2001-10-05T09:28:49-05:00 List-Id: In article <3BBDBB4B.523FDC82@worldnet.att.net>, James Rogers writes: > The C++ String class provides some safety in the use of strings. > For instance, it checks for an attempt to access a string > element beyond the end of the string. Wow !!! Isn't science wonderful ? :-) Yes, I realize the statement was a serious and relevant response to another comment. But I couldn't resist.