From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 109fba,cd8ed9115942852f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 103376,b92b95c9b5585075 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid4f1905883f,gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jed" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why use C++? Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 02:00:28 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1e292299-2cbe-4443-86f3-b19b8af50fff@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com><1fd0cc9b-859d-428e-b68a-11e34de84225@gz10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com><9ag33sFmuaU1@mid.individual.net> <1d8wyhvpcmpkd.ggiui9vebmtl.dlg@40tude.net><150vz10ihvb5a.1lysmewa1muz4$.dlg@40tude.net><1q4c610mmuxn7$.1k6s78wa0r8fj.dlg@40tude.net><4e44e50a$0$7619$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net><4e4560e7$0$6546$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <8739h65nr6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 07:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="KjJVZ+2pm40y3WME79WlsQ"; logging-data="24095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18w6hQFGbWuV76NpQ7azB9S" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rm2XuD+W9XK6dq2IvU8ymNt1a14= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.c++:82967 comp.lang.ada:20625 Date: 2011-08-14T02:00:28-05:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Jed writes: >>> When have you last thought about the size of the components >>> of std::string, of of a vtable? Why, then, is there a >>> pressing need to think about the sizes of int types? >> >> You know that that was a very bad comparison. Completely invalid. > > On the contrary I think this comparison is perfectly valid. ] Who cares what you think?