From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,59c3b3f9911c9191 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.180.96.42 with SMTP id dp10mr307086wib.2.1343205033358; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Path: ge7ni59444794wib.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada.Calendar and NTP (and Unix Epoch) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:30:21 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: References: <500dc548$0$2936$f40e02c5@shockwave.dk.telia.net> <18893cca-baa2-4930-bfb4-4c4f7eb7e983@googlegroups.com> <60c9c92b-280b-4178-a410-2bc8756c6b5e@googlegroups.com> <5513b36d-560f-42ee-b6b6-bdb456097780@googlegroups.com> <12pzip0dlsrbg.8whdrb8jofuq.dlg@40tude.net> <1cqrmg08jnoxn.9eue6ewt00ho$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-07-25T10:30:21+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:05:51 +0400, Vasiliy Molostov wrote: > Dmitry A. Kazakov �����(�) � ����� ������ Wed, > 25 Jul 2012 11:33:17 +0400: > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:04:05 +0400, Vasiliy Molostov wrote: >> >>> Dmitry A. Kazakov �����(�) � ����� ������ >>> Wed, >>> 25 Jul 2012 10:32:05 +0400: >>> >>>>> If you can synchronize representations, you are a god of time >>>>> representations. >>>> >>>> Synchronization does not necessarily means that you control the clocks. >>> >>> Do you see the terminology diff: "time represented" and "time valued"? >>> Why you insist on false obvious mistake you follow due to this >>> difference? >> >> There is certainly no such thing as "time value." What is the point? > > It is the source of time representation. The representation is determined by the clock. So? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de