From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,90108ed846e3f1bf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder8.cambrium.nl!feeder6.cambrium.nl!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng1.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Why constructing functions is a mess [was Language lawyer
  question: task activation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <ccf8fc4b-80e3-4732-84e3-16c4e2d10c3d@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
  <p2ugsc0q86gs.1wau2yijrzj7t.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a97231$0$30236$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1mjbcbequf1wz.1o3nwuz7oqteo.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a984f6$0$30226$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <f7marceobkvv.gyibyusp603m$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49ac0595$0$31344$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1p6sf3ykej2ls.10jmdonrmif5h.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49ac2a8e$0$30232$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <7uqw8skbd6y0.ijm97ivq4kei.dlg@40tude.net>
 <7e0cb26f-3648-44ca-9241-9d0b7269e905@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <bvs21rwcqtyz.upt3j8w0e76i$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <b53c3b94-0bd0-4607-abdd-ea41997a57f5@d19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <49AD815A.6020608@obry.net>
 <428cc0d4-78e6-4425-acf9-0b34a48aecce@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <1f408glmm1c4k.rsdiz4l4q8i6.dlg@40tude.net>
 <8890d5f2-488d-4a08-b15b-67766a72782c@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:47:16 +0100
Message-ID: <iz6nx9ozfwjf$.10sywbamjidyo$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Mar 2009 10:47:16 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59379e5b.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=c6hKU9i@cI3U`5g[@c]@J1McF=Q^Z^V384Fo<]lROoR1^YC2XCjHcb9LZCG]_69gT3DNcfSJ;bb[5FCTGGVUmh?4LK[5LiR>kg2h?\_JD1no34
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3924
Date: 2009-03-04T10:47:16+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:05:26 -0800 (PST), christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
wrote:

> On Mar 4, 9:32�am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
> wrote:
>> I investigated it shortly. It compiles only under AdaGIDE. It does not when
>> compiled from a command line (gcc -c -gnat05) or GPS. It looks like a weird
>> artefact of...
> 
> Are you really sure AdaGIDE uses the same version? It just forwards
> the file to the compiler, so how can there be a difference?

There is no others. OK, I have same 6.2.1 for Windows and VxWorks targets
but, I am pretty sure that it is not the VxWorks one that AdaGIDE uses.
(:-)) It is really weird. I have no idea.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de