From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,158ce2376534c35d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!jacob-sparre.dk!ada-dk.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Derived private interface
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:12:42 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <iv7krc$lgs$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: 
 <27656578-65aa-48b9-9f89-4ebd4e0cb02a@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <0fe3b0f8-c064-444d-899d-640e891b58c3@w4g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <128d8eb5-1cc6-47e3-a09b-b53a5ef289ce@m10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <4e141501$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4b2728fc-6127-45d8-a314-9fc491701c26@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <4e145c3a$0$6542$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <iv2e0o$uri$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <4e14dc0c$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <425f89e6-8c77-4615-a717-f6991ca63b65@v12g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <4e15be36$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1c98072b-e5b9-43dd-9fde-f6687086deef@w24g2000yqw.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1310152364 22044 69.95.181.76 (8 Jul 2011 19:12:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 19:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20144
Date: 2011-07-08T14:12:42-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com> wrote in message 
news:1c98072b-e5b9-43dd-9fde-f6687086deef@w24g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
...
> (Aspect specifications don't currently allow lists of identifiers, but
> this could probably be changed compatibly.)

Actually, aspect_specifications allow any syntax that the implementer wants 
to support - 13.3.1(38/3). To use them portably, of course, you have to 
stick to the language-defined aspects and syntax, but no surprise there.

This was done so that implementers could experiment with ideas like this, 
the unfinised Global in/global out proposal, and exception contracts, all of 
which require fancier syntax than is currently defined.

                     Randy.