From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gib Bogle Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 09:57:12 +1200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dbd6e9c$0$12957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <925saiFj03U7@mid.individual.net> <4dbe2304$0$12961$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <4dda0486$0$67782$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dda09ca$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4e098093$0$79550$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <1bei2e54d4.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> <86iprpz1jy.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> <86sjqo1xms.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: g2qx4yoS+W7m4fJcL5PhWA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com sci.math:225433 comp.lang.fortran:42822 comp.lang.ada:20070 Date: 2011-07-03T09:57:12+12:00 List-Id: On 7/3/2011 3:59 AM, Mart van de Wege wrote: > Gib Bogle writes: > >> On 6/29/2011 4:47 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote: >>> Gib Bogle writes: >>>> >>>> The problem with Wikipedia is that it required a lot of discretion and >>>> discrimination on the part of the user. It is very good in some >>>> areas, and very unreliable in others (just as some people are reliable >>>> sources of information, and others are not). >>> >>> Well yeah, but this is a particularly useless observation. >> >> You want usefulness in a usenet post? My advice is: look elsewhere. > > I am reading this from comp.lang.ada, which is a very useful group, > thank you very much. > > Mart > comp.lang.fortran is also a very useful group, for Fortran-related matters. It isn't necessarily useful on any other random topic.