From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Kuyper Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:27:21 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dbd6e9c$0$12957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <925saiFj03U7@mid.individual.net> <4dbe2304$0$12961$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <4dda0486$0$67782$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dda09ca$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4e098093$0$79550$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <1bei2e54d4.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> <1baad16gre.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="z6x13JPcEt9SiQRsy+GiBQ"; logging-data="1868"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18axE/bQRhYcODZHE6bk7axTdSUWmxLbms=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <1baad16gre.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:dJIaxX0IAT2CJxf0s9NlF3Mkcjo= Xref: g2news2.google.com sci.math:242245 comp.lang.c:130812 comp.lang.fortran:44930 comp.lang.pl1:2701 comp.lang.ada:21024 Date: 2011-06-28T20:27:21-04:00 List-Id: On 06/28/2011 12:51 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > Chris H writes: ... > So, rather than blanket statements regarding the unreliability of wikis, > or anecdotes regarding your friend the expert, are you claiming the > wikipedia author mis-quoted the statistics? Or do you have a "more > reliable" source that says says something different? He's been asked several times now whether he has a more reliable source, and he hasn't bothered responding to those questions. That's pretty strong evidence that he doesn't have any, though it's not conclusive. -- James Kuyper