From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ae0c567a4b40a4ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada bindings to Linux GUI toolkits ? References: From: M E Leypold Date: 04 Jul 2006 02:04:55 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.219.12 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1151971099 88.72.219.12 (4 Jul 2006 01:58:19 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5460 Date: 2006-07-04T02:04:55+02:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Simon Clubley wrote: > > I think that the most annoying thing is that GtkAda started out life > > as > > GMGPL[1] before been changed to pure GPL and then impacting all the projects > > built up until then. If it had been GPL at the start, then that would have > > been known _before_ designing and writing any code. > > There is no impact on projects that use a GMGPL version of GtkAda. If > you got a GMGPL version and you stick with it, you still have a GMGPL > version. The GMGPL interested community would have to maintain (i.e. bugfix and conservatively extend) the GMGPL version for the next years. Is it big enough? Regards -- Markus