From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60dd4fe7723c0ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies announces GNATCOM
Date: 2000/04/09
Message-ID: <iqTH4.4563$Qy3.316083@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 608591895
References: <8coc5e$do2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 955253518 206.170.2.21 (Sat,
 08 Apr 2000 21:11:58 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 21:11:58 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > C_Pass_By_Copy or Unchecked_Union ...
>
> These are not exactly GNAT specific, they are implemented
> in most Ada 95 compilers, ...

What is the status of those as *official* modifications to the
Ada standard?