From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,232e89dd4cc3c154
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,232e89dd4cc3c154
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,232e89dd4cc3c154
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,dea70f96af442ea2
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 103376,232e89dd4cc3c154
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: 
 gid9ef9b79ae9,gid4516fb5702,gid8d3408f8c3,gidbda4de328f,gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:01:28 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ipd9oo$kug$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4db90113$0$77724$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <ipbjqf$q4k$1@dont-email.me> <ipd5i2011p@news6.newsguy.com>
 <91ukucFq9cU2@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:02:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KiwfXDyOjqGhZBXcfNnZBg";
	logging-data="21456"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CCmBN4GdH4QtOv6e3W8E7"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
In-Reply-To: <91ukucFq9cU2@mid.individual.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nW8DwfIZQyCLz4Grj+VqiGsciiI=
Xref: g2news2.google.com sci.math:234215 comp.lang.c:126617
 comp.lang.fortran:41258 comp.lang.pl1:2419 comp.lang.ada:20052
Date: 2011-04-28T23:01:28-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 4/28/2011 10:09 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 04/29/11 01:50 PM, David Bernier wrote:
>> [...]
>> All we have now are George Marsaglia's posts and writings.
>> I know there's now a move on the way to 64-bit processors,
>> which I take to mean the x86_64 or AMD64 design/instruction set.
>
> The move happened several years ago (at least on the desktop and server).

     ... for suitable values of "several."  DEC's first Alpha CPU's
shipped in 1992, and are now old enough to vote.

>> In any case, with an executable compiled with a C compiler,
>> there's the function sizeof, which might be useful
>> in some cases at run time.
>
> Being pedantic, sizeof is a compile time operator when used with
> integral types.

     It's an operator, always.  It's evaluable at compile time for
any operand, integral or not, except a variable-length array (whose
element count is not determined until run time).

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid