From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc65ab136f46904d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT.Serial_Communications Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <9af0087d-9637-40d9-8c30-2e06c2d1e4f4@o26g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <31dd80b2-3fd3-4078-8774-c396a52c94a0@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <0d509f1c-4ca7-4595-a026-65c108558d76@bl1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <35515c03-f565-4fc4-ac1c-e9b7268123b3@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <1144e8e4-4193-4ffd-a8d2-145c38993eb2@p16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <6301289c-f450-4d7f-8391-01e17d2555b9@z27g2000prz.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="zc9mA4TqFT4vXl+a6CS7PA"; logging-data="10678"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18J3021Y/pgIKXYVWbAZ9WW4rWYgkVlDkY=" User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NCfXkgu+PZyk9eQ6YOFCfW2sr10= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18986 Date: 2011-04-22T15:54:57+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 05:28:42 +0100, Simon Wright wrote: > Brian Drummond writes: > >> (1) modify g-sercom-linux.adb to do the job, or at least, what it's >> supposed to (not corrupt settings unnecessarily). Then ... what has to >> happen to regenerate the GNAT.Serial_Communications package? > Put the modified g-sercom-linux.adb in the compiler's search path, then > use the "-a" flag to gnatmake. presumably the right thing to do for this application... > (b) don't say "gnatmake -f" for a full rebuild or you'll end up > rebuilding the RTS! Would that be the right thing to do to avoid the problem in all future applications? - Brian