From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9b0810d3106d9b8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.71.90.67.MISMATCH!news.unit0.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fun with C Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:15:50 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <27cf3992-4132-4483-9110-adc7a089cd4a@e8g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <3ccf18a2-ba10-42bc-aeab-9368749961fb@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4c2b6a58-e3b6-47da-95e0-64853be5c1f9@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <86748003-860f-4729-ae26-55be1e58ac2b@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4b5748dc-60fa-4cec-a317-054626e9a1ca@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1908th3tyz101.1f6c5w8t9mggy.dlg@40tude.net> <2118e788-7b3e-4d25-8d0f-5e60498e3a3b@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="vQOapoBCnbPqo6W3WBfabg"; logging-data="10840"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184X879aOQhzCVK+RH97s9e" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <2118e788-7b3e-4d25-8d0f-5e60498e3a3b@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:6H4/L8b72VwgR72qeW2uafhe7tY= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19950 Date: 2011-04-22T14:15:50+02:00 List-Id: Le 22/04/2011 08:16, Elias Salom�o Helou Neto a �crit : > Yep. That's a major problem. No matter how much I try to teach people > to think before coding, they won't do so. But I don't think that Ada > makes it any better, does it? No, it just makes it more likely that inconsistent design will produce code that does not compile. > Of course this is a rather good justification for Ada to be more > widely adopted. As I've said elsewhere on this thread, Ada's premises > are far more realistic than C's ones. But it does not make C a lame > language. > C is not a lame language, because it fulfills its intended purpose: a portable assembly language. The trouble is if you take it for anything else. My view of the difference between C and Ada is as follows: C is the best language to program a computer; Ada is the best language to develop a software application. (please don't quote me on the first half without the second one!) C is simply unbearable to people who are used to thinking at a higher level. (Says someone who programmed in an earlier life at a much lower level than anybody does nowadays - in binary, directly on the keys of a control panel).