From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,LOTS_OF_MONEY, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: "Manfred Kremer" <0845330659-0001@t-online.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial project? Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:12:19 +0100 Organization: Zuhause Message-ID: References: <4d78867e$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <87r5afv0qa.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4d78a96b$0$23753$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d78c3c6$0$23757$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Reply-To: "Manfred Kremer" <0845330659-0001@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1299831141 01 n5799 F8rTCtnlsVfCPhw 110311 08:12:21 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: GhzrCZZawe3LfrpA8YSKJh6KAkOHyYeYL2jqVPXDv3cl9JgwN7p2kw In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19042 Date: 2011-03-11T09:12:19+01:00 List-Id: Wonder what happened to the Ada Compiler Validation Suite. Was this abandoned or is it still maintained to reflect recent changes to the ARM? For several years I had the impression that the Validation Suite is something that distinuishes Ada from other programming languages and could be a reason to use validated Ada compilers. Manfred "Randy Brukardt" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:ilber1$hcc$1@munin.nbi.dk... > "Thomas L�cke" wrote in message > news:4d78c3c6$0$23757$14726298@news.sunsite.dk... >> On 2011-03-10 12:12, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>> Ada 2005 was not that big step forward. >> >> That makes it even more odd/annoying that 6 years down the line, someone >> like Maciej still can't use plain Ada 2005 features without running into >> compiler issues/errors. > > Interfaces are a particularly difficult feature to get even close to > right. I'd expect to be finding bugs in those essentially forever (just as > happens with finalization). Indeed, these are hard enough to implement > that there are no plans to implement them in Janus/Ada in the forseeable > future (modulo a customer with $$$, of course). There are a lot of other > things that Janus/Ada needs that will take an order of magnitude less > development time (and thus are much better choices for development > effort). > > This is a problem with MI in general, not just with Ada. Bugs are still > turning up in C++ compilers, and they have more than a decade's head start > on GNAT... > > Randy. > >