From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++? Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:45:17 -0800 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <2185773e9989bdc43261515b3d40d45f@remailer.paranoici.org> Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: tUYQ4Ty9mMw9Pdc8TJRFQA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18432 Date: 2011-02-19T14:45:17-08:00 List-Id: On 2/19/2011 2:36 PM, Anonymous wrote: >> That is why I do not like Fortran choice of a comment line, which is "!" > > Actually the FORTRAN (all CAPS) choice of a comment line is "C" not "!"! > >> I have no idea who selected ! for comment in fortran, I think it was >> bad choice, IMNSHO. > > You missed the first 40 years of FORTRAN development. I have no idea if/when > anybody started using "!" but I never saw it. > It is Fortran, not FORTRAN. You mean you did not look at any fortran code for the last 21 years? "!" is the fortran comment since fortran 1990. C comment is long dead. May be you should try to look at some Fortran code? :) An example, http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Fortran-Comments.html "Fortran mode can also handle the Fortran 90 comment syntax where comments start with �!� and can follow other text." http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/COURSES/cs201/NOTES/chap01/comment.html > Anyway it's alot of fun to argue about C/C++ operators like == when C/C++ > butchers other operators. == is the smallest of its problems. > --Nasser