From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chuck" <chuckmacdonald@nospam.me>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:54:30 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ijl539$otk$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: 
 <104cfd9f-dbf5-4f05-9c4a-a2319dd371a9@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <alpine.WNT.2.00.1102161829430.1328@WHIRLWIND>
 <ijivb2$b60$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4d5d0c16$0$6972$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <ijjbf0$gjt$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4d5d4cde$0$13901$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <alpine.WNT.2.00.1102171230500.644@WHIRLWIND>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="Nvo31E/p3EKlT4bDI5+9FA";
	logging-data="25524"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19771h5rRBpYHp5tOT4E2XH"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QeYBJ9cNoGV6+ruHTuqb3oqYQlY=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18373
Date: 2011-02-18T00:54:30-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Peter C. Chapin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
>> There in a nutshell is what all language wars come to: My favorite
>> language has powerful features which could be misused, but no one
>> would do that. Your favorite language has unfortunate features which
>> render all programs written in it unreliable and incomprehensible.
>
> Yes, you can write excellent software in any reasonable language and
> you can write bad software in any reasonable language. The rest is
> just details. :)

Next cliche wins??? AGE CHECK!!!