Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:41:10 +0100, Mike Sieweke > a écrit: > >> KK6GM wrote: >> >>> So, without turning into a bash-fest, what are some >>> general-consensus weaknesses or failures or problems with C++? >>> Comparisons with Ada are welcome but not required. And my focus is >>> in the embedded & real-time arenas, FWIW. >> >> The flaws in C++ are too numerous for a newsgroup posting. >> A bullet list would run into several pages. >> >> You should read Ian Joyner's critique: >> http://www.zechweb.de/Joyners_cpp_critique/ >> >> You should also read the C++ FQA (frequently questioned answers) >> by Yossi Kreinin: >> http://www.yosefk.com/c++fqa/index.html >> >> Do a Google search for "dark side of C++" and you'll find >> even more. This one seems especially interesting: >> http://port70.net/~nsz/16_c++.html >> >> -- Mike Sieweke >> -- "Just a bit of harmless brain alteration, that's all..." > > At least, we could reasonably admit there is not so much literatures > about Ada miss-conceptions (or may one could argue that's only > because Ada is less popular than C++ ?). Would anyone really want to develop a programming language for a military or a goverment? Ada is historical.