From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,ab1d177a5a26577d X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chuck" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++? Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:38:03 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1ee1a434-4048-48f6-9f5e-d8126bebb808@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Nvo31E/p3EKlT4bDI5+9FA"; logging-data="23180"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+i7xEqmBBecYYUgI0TR91N" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vEnpdevqKcR0npYsU81JFY7UM4Y= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17398 Date: 2011-02-18T00:38:03-06:00 List-Id: Mike Sieweke wrote: > KK6GM wrote: > >> So, without turning into a bash-fest, what are some general-consensus >> weaknesses or failures or problems with C++? Comparisons with Ada >> are welcome but not required. And my focus is in the embedded & >> real-time arenas, FWIW. > > The flaws in C++ are too numerous for a newsgroup posting. No they aren't. > A bullet list would run into several pages. Sure, if you flatten everything to one level. There are major and minor deficits at the least. This is USENET, don't try to put one over on anyone, because these people are very smart.