From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97819f4f06661130
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generic Containers in Ada2005
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:10:33 -0700
Organization: TornevallNET - http://news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <iiupuf$7uu$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: 
 <d066a30c-b356-4b28-b713-764c2b895022@d17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <1vw9tbt1xma5m.cvy6d03i25d1.dlg@40tude.net>
 <f2eeb807-0fcd-4587-9010-9d2a179aa642@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66fd55b9b12781dbaacdc71f49d7a670
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: 7d8fdf7fb38649470b4c446b06311287
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tornevall.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT ITALIAN,
 FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
In-Reply-To: 
 <f2eeb807-0fcd-4587-9010-9d2a179aa642@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
X-UserIDNumber: 1738
X-Validate-Post: 
 http://news.tornevall.net/validate.php?trace=7d8fdf7fb38649470b4c446b06311287
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
 mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: 0243687135df8c4b260dd4a9a93c79bd
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17130
Date: 2011-02-09T12:10:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 02/09/2011 09:01 AM, Bryan wrote:
>
> Regarding concurrent peers, are the generic containers provided in the
> Ada.Containers library thread-safe?

No. You can safely access different container objects from different tasks at 
the same time, but not concurrent access to the same object from different tasks.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Sir Robin the not-quite-so-brave-as-Sir-Lancelot,
who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor,
who nearly stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol,
and who had personally wet himself at the
Battle of Badon Hill."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
68