From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5f91c25329b1722
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How about that new AdaIC?
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:30:39 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen
Message-ID: <ifea13$ahb$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <ea508b0f-12d7-4bce-9cc3-b1002e848b88@c2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d1884fa$0$6760$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ifb16l$hf3$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <05f82caf-2073-4ee6-af24-1934e68ad3ea@i18g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1293593443 10795 69.95.181.76 (29 Dec 2010 03:30:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 03:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17184
Date: 2010-12-28T21:30:39-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Saulo" <saulo@gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:05f82caf-2073-4ee6-af24-1934e68ad3ea@i18g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> And what about a new look for Ada-Auth.org too!? :D

May I ask why? The purpose of Ada-Auth.org is to provide information; most 
of that information is natively plain text (AIs, Ada source code) and 
attempting to dress it up would detract from the information. (The attempt 
to provide prettier AIs in the version control system also leads to lots of 
people complaining about failures in the automated formatting; it's not 
possible to provide both pretty and 100% accurate results.)

I can see the value of "pretty" for marketing-related sites, but not for raw 
information, especially if it gets in the way of accurately presenting that 
information.

                            Randy.