From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cae92f92d6a1d4b1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BrianG <briang000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Execution_Time
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:07:49 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <iejsu9$lct$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <ie1ih9$d02$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <ie2v2k$aps$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <ie3gjn$oj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4d05e737$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <ie91co$cko$1@news.eternal-september.org> <ief8ou$27ij$1@news.ett.com.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 03:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="P3VOJKrHjsVRylhXLW3J8w";
	logging-data="21917"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vJZ28fU4/gn4lzNpChdAR"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)
In-Reply-To: <ief8ou$27ij$1@news.ett.com.ua>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MIzdMXuhRcRGqzBkWPIM0YNlVvQ=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17007
Date: 2010-12-18T22:07:49-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anon@att.net wrote:
> In <ie91co$cko$1@news.eternal-september.org>, BrianG <briang000@gmail.com> writes:
>> Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>>> On 12/12/10 10:59 PM, BrianG wrote:
...
[Lots of meaningless comments deleted.]
> For the average Ada programmer, its another Ada package that most will 
> never use because they will just use Ada.Real_Time.  
[etc.]
>  In some cases the Ada.Execution_Time
> package can replace the Ada.Real_Time with only altering the with/use 
> statements.
If you mean that they both define a Clock and a Split, maybe.  If you mean
any program that actually does anything, that's not possible.  That was my
original comment:  Execution_Time does not provide any types/operations
useful, without also 'with'ing Real_Time.
> 
[etc.]
(Don't know why I bother w/ this msg.)