From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cae92f92d6a1d4b1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BrianG <briang000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Execution_Time
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:40:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <iebjl0$mll$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <ie1ih9$d02$1@news.eternal-september.org>
	<ie2v2k$aps$1@tornado.tornevall.net>	<ie3gjn$oj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
	<4d05e737$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<ie91co$cko$1@news.eternal-september.org> <m28vzqsoie.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="BssHc7ONlcOOcC5Vapr56Q";
	logging-data="23221"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zuHhTJOm6RImOXIH3drmq"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)
In-Reply-To: <m28vzqsoie.fsf@pushface.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ryxM4Dkpc1Njcc8lUZMr+VgKs14=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15967
Date: 2010-12-15T18:40:14-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright wrote:
> BrianG <briang000@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Given the rest of this thread, I would guess my answer is "No, no one
>> actually uses Ada.Execution_Time".
> 
> Certainly not if they're using Mac OS X:
> 
>    gcc -c cpu.adb
>    Execution_Time is not supported in this configuration
>    compilation abandoned
I get the same with the version of Linux I'm currently on (Ubuntu 9.04 I 
think); I had assumed it's because the version of gcc/gnat is rather old 
- 4.3.3.  (The later Ubuntu versions have problems with my eeepc - and 
introduce stupid interface changes with no easy way to revert.)

--Bg