From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-07 13:01:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.infoave.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!cyclone.swbell.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [off-topic] spam-filters
References: <VtlQ9.42144$%3.10762066@twister.neo.rr.com>
 <C900921B7A3FDDD4.5FD752FF5D42F9AF.349D2214D482463F@lp.airnews.net>
 <autmq3$4oe$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <3E147D79.2070703@cogeco.ca>
 <BA3A535D.177F%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <ba162549.0301030124.237c7a7e@posting.google.com>
 <4519e058.0301031434.51a0c880@posting.google.com>
 <ba162549.0301040053.1e7dbedc@posting.google.com>
 <wmFR9.111225$Y86.101474@news2.central.cox.net>
 <zmHR9.253680$a8.123558@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
 <81NR9.112823$Y86.60750@news2.central.cox.net>
 <1ciS9.217$Z74.1099@dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
 <v1jm80cf6jj990@corp.supernews.com>
 <gorS9.115944$Y86.78987@news2.central.cox.net>
 <v1m8albg7obp2c@corp.supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ieHS9.2360$c6.2604@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 16:01:02 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.133.155
X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com
X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1041973262 151.168.133.155 (Tue,
 07 Jan 2003 16:01:02 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 16:01:02 EST
Organization: Raytheon Company
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32702
Date: 2003-01-07T16:01:02-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> the mail going through their server. Similarly, it is much easier (and
> cheaper) to insure that virii are trapped at the server rather than
> trying to insure that no desktop machine ever reads a dangerous message.

Not to mention that if a virus can get to a desktop
machine, at least half of those machines will pass it on.