From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,36a29c2860aff686 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.in2p3.fr!in2p3.fr!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Properties Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:10:17 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Message-ID: References: <3b84c8e7-1a51-4a7c-9646-119f1fc51478@s4g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <4pnv7nl4cdui$.1n28i7lqk4mek$.dlg@40tude.net> <1k7367gtebsgm$.18auo6u3nfg34.dlg@40tude.net> <1u5dftkqqi68c.10079qnqyyfwb$.dlg@40tude.net> <15tv4yga36dpi$.1hc09dlbgcmqe.dlg@40tude.net> <18768dde-5817-40b9-aaa1-03c620ad7187@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <18f98563-340c-4bc2-83e5-8d1187f92165@j19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1291410619 3022 69.95.181.76 (3 Dec 2010 21:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:10:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15784 Date: 2010-12-03T15:10:17-06:00 List-Id: "Shark8" wrote in message news:18f98563-340c-4bc2-83e5-8d1187f92165@j19g2000prh.googlegroups.com... On Dec 2, 2:57 am, Maciej Sobczak wrote: >> >>Wrong (AARM Annex A, 3.a): >> >>"simultaneous calls to Text_IO.Put will work properly, so long >>as they are going to two different files. On the other hand, >>simultaneous output to the same file constitutes erroneous use >>of shared variables." >Er, then does that mean that the following is wrong? Formally, yes. Practically, no. The underlying OS does not have problems with this sort of construct, nor do any Ada implementations that I am aware of. But of course there is no guarantee as to how the output will be presented. Randy.