From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ichbiah@jdi.tiac.net (Jean D. Ichbiah)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Date: 1995/04/07
Message-ID: <ichbiah.279.2F856C44@jdi.tiac.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100070386
references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk>
 <gauthier-2403951115540001@164.81.60.62> <D645uH.Dqr@nntpa.cb.att.com>
 <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner> <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <ichbiah.271.2F82D56D@jdi.tiac.net> <dewar.797221638@schonberg>
organization: JDI Technology, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dewar.797221638@schonberg> dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
>Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
>Date: 6 Apr 1995 22:27:59 -0400

>There is only one condition on the bet, and that is that whoever pays for
>the bottle, we have to drink it together, OK?

>Robert

Was there ever any other possible interpretation?