From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,edda2b296e2577cf
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT's Protected Objects
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:23:20 -0700
Organization: TornevallNET - http://news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <ibc3l4$8su$2@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: <ib9mv1$23q$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <4af1a5f4-7bf3-47ee-af67-db50e589e7a8@n32g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <ib9ts1$91l$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <wcctyjrl9ms.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <iba4im$dmu$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <wcc7hgmk26z.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bc44c5c2c5bfa0e37884fc9d5b2aab7e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 34e37338b7c6a2f3770f3309a20776ff
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tornevall.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT ITALIAN,
 FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
In-Reply-To: <wcc7hgmk26z.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-UserIDNumber: 1738
X-Validate-Post: 
 http://news.tornevall.net/validate.php?trace=34e37338b7c6a2f3770f3309a20776ff
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
 mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: 0243687135df8c4b260dd4a9a93c79bd
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16381
Date: 2010-11-09T11:23:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11/09/2010 07:21 AM, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> No, as Egil H�vik pointed out, I was wrong, because
> the return expression will be evaluated before
> awaiting dependent tasks.  Your code was right in
> the first place!

I'll have to remember that.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear.
She drove me to drink. That's the one thing I'm
indebted to her for."
Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
109