From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e55245590c829bef
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Beginners question: Compound types, how-to?
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:25:03 -0700
Organization: TornevallNET - http://news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <ian4kl$ppp$2@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: <86wroy58ff.fsf@gareth.avalon.lan>
 <iale5p$2f6$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <C8F4682A.1536ED%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88d9d42e858520989a3da7c1b27ea836
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: 5b0b393940d8ab87991f51c63879f6e9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tornevall.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT ITALIAN,
 FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
In-Reply-To: <C8F4682A.1536ED%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
X-UserIDNumber: 1738
X-Validate-Post: 
 http://news.tornevall.net/validate.php?trace=5b0b393940d8ab87991f51c63879f6e9
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
 mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: 0243687135df8c4b260dd4a9a93c79bd
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16092
Date: 2010-11-01T12:25:03-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11/01/2010 04:50 AM, (see below) wrote:
> On 01/11/2010 04:55, in article iale5p$2f6$1@tornado.tornevall.net, "Jeffrey
> Carter"<spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>  wrote:
>
>> Children always have visibility into the specs of their ancestors, so you
>> never need to "with" said ancestors.
>
> While the first claim is true, the second does not follow, as I am given to
> understand it.
>
> If you need:
>
>    pragma Elaborate_All(<ancestor>);
>
> Then you also need:
>
>    with<ancestor>;

True. I don't expect a beginner to be dealing with elaboration issues, and so 
was referring only to visibility.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Why don't you bore a hole in yourself and let the sap run out?"
Horse Feathers
49