From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ddb34e4ee5e28db0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-26 09:33:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsrout1.ntli.net!news-in.ntli.net!newspeer1-win.server.ntli.net!newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: BIND References: <20040425224751.C907A4C4136@lovelace.ada-france.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:36:47 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.107.63.68 X-Trace: newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net 1082997198 81.107.63.68 (Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:33:18 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:33:18 GMT Organization: NTL Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7510 Date: 2004-04-26T17:36:47+01:00 List-Id: Andrew Carroll wrote: > I also have to laugh. The Ada BIND project, at this point, is > nothing more than an account on sourceforge. There are no > documents, no designs and no source code. There are a bunch > of RFCs and possibly some C code to dig through. No work > has been done, no evaluation of scope has been done, no > feasibility assessment has been done, no requirements gathered, > no stakeholders identified and no vision document drawn up. > Yet many of you are reacting to the Ada BIND proposal like > we just squashed your sweet little wiener dog with our big Ford > 1-ton 4x4 truck. It is such an over reaction that it is funny. I think the problem is that "The Ada BIND project, at this point, is nothing more than an account on sourceforge. There are no documents, no designs and no source code. There are a bunch of RFCs and possibly some C code to dig through. No work has been done, no evaluation of scope has been done, no feasibility assessment has been done, no requirements gathered, no stakeholders identified and no vision document drawn up." ?