From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ba714c9432667bbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Martin M Dowie <martin@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada to Buhr
Date: 1998/01/28
Message-ID: <iQ$9zEADo3z0EwEn@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 320332681
Distribution: world
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dowie-cs.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.207]
References: <JDEHHGAvDkz0EwRy@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>
 <6ansnq$b50@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>Why would you want to convert 300 packages of old Adainto 300 diagrams
>(generally) of an old notation?  If you simply want to see
>dependencies, there's a LOT of simple tools out there that will
>provide you that info.
>
that's the wonder's of company procedures and customer requirements!...

but if you know of a tool that would show dependancies i could give it a
try and see if i can raise a change note to the procedures.
-- 
Martin M Dowie