From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: priority in user-defined operators
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:07:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i8d5tgFadk1U1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4838d33e-cdcf-4374-91e9-21a0b79ddca2n@googlegroups.com>
On 2021-02-08 17:54, Mehdi Saada wrote:
> How goes precedence for user-made operators, like
> ((2/1)*A-B*(13/1))
> but A and B being variables for whatever private types ?
> Is there a way , now or planned in AI, to specify that in aspects ?
No, and deliberately so. The parsing of expressions with operators does
not depend on the identification of the operators as predefined or
user-defined.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 15:54 priority in user-defined operators Mehdi Saada
2021-02-08 16:07 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2021-02-08 16:21 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox