From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a34b7ad6c6a0774
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficiency of code generated by Ada compilers
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:29:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <i44khk$5lv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <op.vheeg0ilxmjfy8@garhos>
NNTP-Posting-Host: J4HSNf9Eqj44wTz1J3b8lQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13255
Date: 2010-08-13T23:29:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>have never heard about a machine with a level array type and an hardware
>check for array access index. Would be interesting if you could be more
  The Burroughs machines were like that.  The descriptor pointing to
an array included the size as well as the base address, so index in-range
was automatically checked by the hardware.