From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada syntax questions
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:35:37 +0200
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <i44ekaFta3oU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <5fdbde31$0$6455$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Hzg973tukp9iKcs9Pbg9UQsDSE3mjN9rnVKv2A4RQFfYo7rOsj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7RVRzLDGTGyy9F+Hvy2lmWzsC6w=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3
In-Reply-To: <5fdbde31$0$6455$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:60883
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2020-12-18 0:39, DrPi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ada claims to have a better syntax than other languages.


I would say the claim is that the Ada syntax was rationally designed to 
have certain properties, which are desired by certain users (us Ada 
programmers) so it is "better" for us, although some aspects are 
subjective for sure.

In addition to what others have said, here are some further comments on 
the examples you gave:


> 1) What about array indexing ?
> In some other languages, arrays are indexed using square brackets. In 
> Ada, parentheses are used for function calls and for array indexing.


There are proposals to allow [] as well as (), mainly to increase 
familiarity for new Ada users.


> 2) In Ada, a function without arguments is called without any parentheses.


Parameterless functions are rare, and properly so.

Parameterless procedures are much more common. Writing

    Frobnicate_Widget();

is longer than

    Frobnicate_Widget;

and seems to have no advantages over the shorter form.