From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,ea40acba15d5d078 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,ea40acba15d5d078 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 101deb,620e03552eca5f22 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5d0be666830517 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid9ef9b79ae9,gid8d3408f8c3,gidbda4de328f,gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mecej4 Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Followup-To: sci.math Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:52:20 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4c4ecbee$0$12393$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net><8bfos5FakcU1@mid.individual.net><4c57f254$0$34569$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4c592648$0$34571$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <8c0nh6FkkvU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Kj3fBLNIrFCKqviRVSpsPA"; logging-data="8120"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/X0oe/d8n9+QUQVuZmALSQ" User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Cancel-Lock: sha1:N/s9HyR5A9zt9p3QlhGbEP8b3kw= Xref: g2news1.google.com sci.math:176948 comp.lang.fortran:26468 comp.lang.pl1:1620 comp.lang.ada:12983 Date: 2010-08-09T09:52:20-05:00 List-Id: Uno wrote: > robin wrote: >> "James Waldby" wrote in message >> news:i39iqp$sg7$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> | On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:41:15 +1000, robin wrote: >> | > "Uno" wrote: >> | [snip code] >> | >> If you were to comment out the PL/I command line that compiled this, >> | >> what would it be? >> | > >> | > ??? >> | >> | Does that mean you don't understand Uno's question, >> | or don't know the answer? >> >> It means that the question makes no sense. >> >> > Does this make sense? > > I'll restate the question, and I'm sure you'll get my drift. When I > compile off a command line, I keep the command lines I used as the final > comments in that file. So there might, in fortran, exist > > implicit real > pi = 4.0 * atan(1.0) > print *, pi > endprogram > > !here it comes, the goocher: > > ! gfortran pi1.f90 -o out > > 1) What did you name this pli thing? > > 2) What command compiled it? > > 3) How does one comment in pli? > > 4) How does one acquire a pli facilty on ubuntu? Those kinds of basic questions are mostly covered by the PL/I FAQ, which is posted quite regularly in this newsgroup. As far as I am aware, there is no production quality native PL/I compiler available for Linux. There is VisualAge PL/I for Windows, which IBM makes available through its Scholars Program to those who qualify or which may be purchased (at significant cost) as part of the Rational Developer for System Z product. -- mecej4