From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e11ef4efc073f6b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: requeue with abort and timed call
References: 
 <2a60b044-6a5c-4ce6-93e6-6eeefc8806c3@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 	<1f6rcb1qwt7vx.1mckzyk9ucohf.dlg@40tude.net>
 <84c56781-1cb1-4d86-be14-e66fc9fdade6@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
 	<7p8onuvzdz18$.1m1dq8n3b52q5.dlg@40tude.net> <9j9ajg.3a7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 	<2a0a1de3-6736-4478-9378-50b8895fa20d@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 	<kepcjg.od.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <a2cbdab7-d410-4bc3-b06b-43370454855b@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 	<jjdfjg.9r6.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <133a14c1-efc1-4a27-bc66-cff24a75ef93@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 	<mq5gjg.bai.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <a0204e36-2c30-4c5f-916c-a47a9fd23d3d@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 	<4uQ7l.509148$yE1.49118@attbi_s21>
 <59cc2eb1-622d-488c-b7bf-10471e538ca9@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <59cc2eb1-622d-488c-b7bf-10471e538ca9@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <i368l.510363$yE1.335703@attbi_s21>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.16.158.68
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1231088974 173.16.158.68 (Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:09:34 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:09:34 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:09:34 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3196
Date: 2009-01-04T17:09:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

christoph.grein@eurocopter.com wrote:
> 
> That's correct, but you'll get the same (wrong) result when you store
> output in an intermediate container and output everything at the end.

If it retains the delay in the protected action, the program is still in error. 
The output cannot be "wrong", since the language does not define the semantics 
of the error.

The point I was making is that the language does not and need not define what 
happens in such a case, unlike for a task, where the delay is perfectly legal.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Hello! Smelly English K...niggets."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
08