From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,751d508677a5add1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news2.dg.net.ua!news.ett.com.ua!not-for-mail From: anon@att.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA made me hate programming Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 23:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Organization: ETT newsserver Message-ID: References: <8f469661-370c-4484-82d8-f1b365455e0f@w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: anon@anon.org NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-4.225.174.33.dial1.dallas1.level3.net X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.ett.com.ua X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.6.1 X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:13150 Date: 2010-07-04T23:22:11+00:00 List-Id: In , "Marc A. Criley" writes: >On 07/03/2010 04:50 PM, anon@att.net wrote: > >> The mid-course correction type of systems is outdated > >Again... "obviously unfamiliar with the field". > >IFTUs are utilized by deployed missile systems, today, and will be for >years to come. And are utilized by new and upgraded missile designs. > > > and has been reported that it has been hacked > >By whom? When? What was the nature of the "hack"? Was it done in a >government defense lab to assess vulnerability? Did it happen on a >battlefield somewhere? Cite a trustworthy source of such a "report". > > I do not remember who said but it under the Bush jr. administration and they said that the missile were hack. This was reported at the end of Bush jr first term. Also, if a person works in the R&D for a missile, you know the paper work a person signs keeps that person from giving too many details, unless they would like to be charge with Treason. >Any "outdated system" that works is better than one that exists only as >a proposal or in theory. > >Marc A. Criley Yes, outdated. The gov't wants their young fighter who are great at video-game war to use be remote controlled missile. A few can act like 100s of fighters, but that has been hack. So, the gov't now into pattern recognition, where a missile is given a set of pictures, etc. and let that puppy go hunting. The system would pick the first, if possible do it job, if not goes find the second on the list, and so on through the list until the job is done or the list is empty or its out of range then it self-destruct to keep the technology from the wrong hands. The idea is to kill the CEO and its "board of directories" with a few "stock holders" to boot and no more war with little to no passer-by being hurt. Just a "Nice and Clean" kill. But pattern recognition will never be 100 percent. And the general public say no to this technology because this type of killing is inhumane. War is suppose to be messy not clean and it over quickly. The clean type of war allows a war to last 10, 25 or even a 100 plus years. And the people were are fighting now would love a 100 years war, they would win in the end because the world will turn against us by that time. But lets get back to Ada. because this is Ada's newsgroup not a weapons newsgroup. And weapons are only one of many things that Ada can be great at, if its allowed to be. If people start creating libraries instead of just binders for other languages.