From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0f6c37e3c1b712a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO? References: <1151405920.523542.137920@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151434144.2179.36.camel@localhost> From: M E Leypold Date: 28 Jun 2006 02:06:02 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.243.222 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1151452788 88.72.243.222 (28 Jun 2006 01:59:48 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5156 Date: 2006-06-28T02:06:02+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 17:00 +0200, M E Leypold wrote: > > > # Alex Bykat who helped us compile GtkAda 0.2 on Solaris 2.5. > > # ... > > # Preben Randhol who has contributed several patches, in particular for porting gate to glade-2. > > > Useful, this, isn't it? > > Could make a change if members of the above list decided to > make a GMGPL Edition from their earlier work. > But just in case, this isn't useful as a licensing argument. > A quote from the GNU site illustrates: > "If you modify this code, you may extend this exception to your version > of the code, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to > do so, delete this exception statement from your version." Wonderful. Now tell me what rights ACT had to strip the linking exception from most files of florist. Please do that after diffing GPL florist against 3.15p. Also, why the GtkAda license changed w/o any change in source (2.4.0). Thanks -- Markus > So the release of a modified GtkAda may drop the > exception without consulting the originators. Which makes GMGPL it inferior to LGPL. :-) You contribute under condition X and are never sure wether and when it will change to condition Y. > I can't say whether or not the members of the above list > like the new facts. Nor can I. Regards -- Markus